Run an AI Code Review Before the Human One
4 fill-in slots · from The AI Prompt Handbook for Mobile App Development
Your details
0/4 filledRun an AI Code Review Before the Human One
Background: Native [iOS / Android] app, [architecture], [minimum OS]. Team conventions worth knowing: [threading rules, error handling, whatever your team cares about]. Here is the diff: [Paste the changed files, or the PR diff] Use case: Review this the way a demanding senior mobile engineer would, before I put it in front of one. Implementation details: - Correctness first: threading and main-thread violations, lifecycle and scope handling, retain cycles or leaked coroutines, force-unwraps and null handling, state that can get out of sync - Then mobile-specific concerns: does this work offline, on a slow connection, on a small screen, with the largest accessibility font, in the background, on a cold start - Then fit: does it match the architecture and conventions above - Then tests: is what's tested the part that can actually break - Rank findings by severity and say plainly which ones you'd block on Deliverable: A prioritised review with file and line references, severity, the concrete failure each finding causes, and a suggested fix. Separate "this is a bug" from "this is taste"—and say which of your findings you're least sure about.
Highlighted [slots] are still empty. Downloads are plain .txt — paste into any AI assistant.